« links for 2005-05-07 | Main | links for 2005-05-08-10 »


Matt Lachey

You obviously hit the nail on the head. The name, in my opinion, is pretty good, but the process to select it is bogus. I can entirely understand how the MU community is upset as throughout this most recent process the one point that was constantly made was that the administration could not repeat the alienation that occurred in 1994. Somehow they missed this point, again.

I think the name will stick. And it will be a good fit for MU. However, it never should have been selected by a minority of people who have clearly missed the mark time and time again.


I hope the name sticks too...it may not be perfect, but we have to settle on something. Changing it again would look even more foolish.

The comments to this entry are closed.